In brief

In this blog, published at the start of 2023, David Robinson offers some personal reflections on working towards deep rooted, sustained social change. He draws out two urgent and important lessons from 40 years working in this space: plant trees and stir the soul. 

I realise that commenting on political commentary may not be the most obvious way to thrill and  inspire in my first blog of 2023, but please bear with me, I think there is something interesting here:

End of year editorials across the print media in recent weeks have noted the “return to economic orthodoxy” following the autumn collapse of the Truss administration. Some commentators have even called it a “return to common sense”.

This phrase, “economic orthodoxy”, recognises that although PMs may have come and gone, core principles of economic management in the UK have been largely wedded to a governing belief in the primacy of the market for at least the last fifty years.

Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek ignited the intellectual sparks of this movement in the 1930s and 40s. A constellation of academics and influencers, then policy makers and politicians, were gradually attracted to the flame. When a series of economic crises rocked the post war Keynesian consensus in the 1970s an alternative was ready. Margaret Thatcher’s property owning democracy, the veneration of wealth, privatisation, deregulation, growth at any price, all started here and didn’t stop there. 

Governments of different hues have flexed and moderated the principles over the last half century but essentially an all-conquering economic orthodoxy took hold and hasn’t let go. It became what all pragmatic politicians promised and delivered.

Individualism, and the driving logic of the market, have defined the economy, fashioned the language of political discussion and bled into the ways in which we think about ourselves and one another. “Who is society?” asked Thatcher, “there is no such thing”.

Bit by bit, we began to disconnect the consequences of our conduct as consumers from our interests and responsibilities as neighbours and citizens. 

The economic orthodoxy became the political, and the political has become the social – the new common sense, defining social behaviour and moulding an approach to our shared lives that is competitive and distrusting, impersonal and transactional, intolerant, fearful and fundamentally unfit for the challenges of today, let alone of tomorrow. 

The Guardian concludesThe failure of post-Thatcherite economic orthodoxy compels Labour to expand its political imagination.”

That’s not enough. We all need to think differently.

So what?

I think there are two ways in which this history is relevant to the work of The Relationships Project and to our vision of a world where relationships come first. 

First there is the “what happened “story: The one about how a neoliberal economic model has led to a systematic erosion in the currency of relationships; about how our lives, our communities and ultimately our nation states are built from the aggregation of personal relationships and about how, when these bonds fail, entire communities have been left behind, unwell and unhappy, lonely, distrustful and polarised.

And then there is the “how did it happen” story: The story about how the rush of economic crises in the 1970s swept ideas, which had been long in the making, out from the Seminar room and into the real world. It is this story that strikes me as especially relevant at the start of 2023.

This moment

In reports from our Relationships Observatory on the impacts of Covid we heard one contributor ask “can anyone come out of this and not be changed by it?” and we quoted Professor Peter Hennessy’s belief that future historians would divide the post war years into the pre Covid and post Covid periods – such would be its long term significance.  

At the height of the pandemic individuals, communities and organisations changed. We saw behaviours that were principle led, rather than rules based, cemented by solidarity rather than compliance, less defensive, kinder, more emotionally responsive, personal and human. It was a time when relationships came first. We glimpsed an alternative future and largely it worked.

Now, as the cost of living crisis ploughs into Covid’s deep tissue damage, communities sandblasted by years of austerity face new needs with services stretched to breaking point. 

It is hard to escape the conclusion that if a paradigm shift needs proof of concept and a catalytic crisis, this may well be its time.

Perhaps it seems grandiose and preposterous to compare our ambitions with an ideology and an intellectual movement as rigorous and powerful as neoliberalism, but nothing starts like that. It began with a handful of individuals exchanging ideas, making models, sharing and persuading. Then a long march. 

From a very personal perspective, two transferable lessons seem urgent and important to me:

Plant trees

I think about some of the social action I have been involved with over the years, promising to change the world with two workers and a filing cabinet, cobbling together policies, even entire manifestos, in fractions of the time required for serious labour, pea shooter budgets, fantasy time scales, honourable intentions, fabulous aspirations. 

I think about Hayek and all that ensued, the painstaking realism, the serious and sustained investment of time, money and professional reputations, the dogged commitment to steady infiltration, growing and sustaining networks, building influence for as long as it takes.  

Then I make the comparison: We did good stuff in the moment but too often we spoke of planting trees, when we were sowing mustard and cress.

So how can we plant trees instead of cress?

In our work on promoting relationship-centred practice, we stand on the shoulders of giants. Successful work has been patiently making the case for many years, but much of this activity has been taking place in pockets, fragmented and disconnected. Our event in Newcastle at the end of last year offered a glimpse of what might be possible when we come together to share ideas, practice and dreams. Over the next two years and beyond we hope to tend to the roots by opening up nourishing opportunities for connection, collaboration and belonging. 

Our newly appointed Relationships Collective will be turning up the dial on our mission in 2023– nine brilliant, experienced relationship-centred practitioners across different disciplines, maintaining their day jobs but also helping to grow the field. Together we will be convening events, mapping the field, collecting stories, growing learning hubs and developing practitioner communities. 

Stir the soul

A new economic theory might have remained just that, an economic theory, or a passing fad, were it not for the recognition captured in Thatcher’s  pithy phrase “Economics is the means. The end is to change the soul”.

I have seen, sometimes been a part of, some hugely promising one term or one place wonder projects which have struggled to generate and sustain momentum beyond a few years or a single locality because, wonderful though the work might be, it has danced around the edges of the dominant orthodoxies and established systems. Almost by stealth, in fact sometimes deliberately by stealth, stuff happened but without a story it didn’t engage the soul of the society, small or large, that it sought to change. It didn’t move how people think. At best, the revolution stalled.

So how can we stir the soul?

Putting relationships first is a metamorphic idea. It’s a big, open, soul shaping approach with a built in capacity for regeneration. Every relationship is an agent of change – we develop as individuals and we change one another. Whenever we choose to build a relationship where once the connection was transactional, we liberate ourselves, our essential humanity, from the constraints of process and structure. So it is that every positive relationship releases another genie to pass on the magic. Talking about it across sectors and silos and in concert begins to change the soul of whatever society we inhabit.

A 2 year plan and a 20 year vision

Popular and enduring change cannot be imposed but we can open up the possibility with patient, egoless case making action on the ground, with the sustained, collaborative development of an honest, evolving narrative and, above all, with one another. 

At the start of 2023 we have a two year plan and a twenty year vision. Join us. Plant trees and stir the soul.
Active Neighbours – Kate

Active Neighbours – Kate

“I just think it’s really nice we can each all be each other’s solutions – people are volunteering not because they feel obligated because they’re family -they just want to help you. I always think that’s really powerful. If everyone put in just a few hours a week to help in their community, we can change so much. And I think that’s what we’ve seen during Covid.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Julie

Active Neighbours – Julie

“The satisfaction you get from volunteering is really fulfilling. You get home and know you’ve helped someone that day. It enabled me to meet new people – other volunteers, those we helped. Having the opportunity to talk to some elderly people in the community. When you’re not from somewhere, when would you ever have the opportunity to talk to someone from a different generation?”

read more
Active Neighbours – Josie

Active Neighbours – Josie

“[Covid] was an almighty stop. There are so many people that are natural doers – volunteering and helping others was possibly the only thing they could do. A lot of people potentially thought that was their only option to continue to do something. Covid gave everyone the opportunity to step slightly out of their comfort zone. Everyone needs that door to be slightly open to be able to step through [….] I just have to say that the food bank needs peanut butter, 12 hours later there will be 56 jars on my porch”

read more
Active Neighbours – Jen

Active Neighbours – Jen

“I’m a big believer in gratitude and what you give out is what you get back, and the law of attraction. So I’m that kind of person: what you give out is what you get back. So just being a nice person, and just trying to help and be generous with your time … if you can. Anything you can do to help somebody.”

read more
Active Neighbours – James

Active Neighbours – James

“Not patriotism, but I think society is under stress at the moment. I don’t think the government, whatever your view on this particular government, is necessarily capable of meeting all needs. So it’s quite nice to have a purpose to do stuff when you can see an overwhelming need for it. So yes, a massive sense of fulfilment. And I think as I’d alluded to before that when I’d retired I felt I needed something to do. But it’s been great because I’ve met more people in the neighbourhood, working in the kitchen I’ve met some great people – learned much more about food! So generally I’ve enjoyed both experiences a lot.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Isabel

Active Neighbours – Isabel

“I think what was really cool at the beginning was it felt like you had this whole potential to really rethink how you interacted with your local area. There was a real sense of possibility that you were really kind of mini-world making or something […] I think politically a lot of people really frown down on traditional charity models – particularly the bifurcation of service users and service providers, and felt like what was needed was something that really lifted people up in the community, and made everyone feel like they were valued and had something to contribute […] which is still a noble goal – but I think it’s hard to do in practice.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Brianne

Active Neighbours – Brianne

“So it’s just the connections that have been made, the nice people and the people who have really needed the help that I’ve met. And just seeing everyone come together. I’ve always thought this area has a great sense of community, but this has shown it even more. And it’s shown the people that don’t normally have the time to give to this community – they’ve gone ‘here you go’.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Anna

Active Neighbours – Anna

“In the past I’ve done very much paper-based volunteering, because I guess that’s where my skills lie – but maybe I’ve realised that I quite enjoy meeting people and having that interaction. In particular, I think I’ve enjoyed meeting people that are outside my social circle – because you know, we’re all guilty of having our own little group […], so seeing that people have very different lives – not better or worse, just different, you know – I think has been really interesting for me.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Alan

Active Neighbours – Alan

“I think it’s an interesting one actually for people of my age – single men. At my age – there’s a question of ‘what are you allowed to join?’ that will be positively received? […] There’s a sort of suspicion. But the Covid thing – I think what I really liked about it was the sense that anyone could join and we couldn’t see what each other looked like – we didn’t know how old we were. We didn’t know what social background we were from, we weren’t even talking to one another – because it was all text-based. And so in that sense it was a great leveler, I thought.”

read more
Active Neighbours – Elizabeth

Active Neighbours – Elizabeth

“And getting out of your own comfort zone a bit … empathy more than sympathy was somebody else’s phrase … trying to help people out not just because they are like you or because they’ve been through what you’ve been through, but because they just need a bit of help. That to me is what citizenship and community are about.”

read more
LinkedIn
Share
WhatsApp